A few days ago, the prosecution in Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin filed its Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motions in Limine (linked to here). To put this into context and plain English, Chauvin’s defense counsel has moved to preclude the prosecution from presenting at trial certain proffered evidence, and, by its memorandum of law, the prosecution is arguing why the challenged evidence is relevant and material. By email the estimable Scott Johnson of Powerline forwarded a link to the prosecution’s memorandum of law and asked for my thoughts. That email arrived around 6:00 PM. Before replying, I decided to engage in […]